您的位置:小马过河 > GRE频道页 > GMAT > GMAT作文考试错误的七宗罪
400-920-8185

GMAT作文考试错误的七宗罪

2014-07-24 14:38 小马过河 admin

分享到:0

摘要:复习GMAT考试的时候要注意自己的作文,GMAT作文是这项考试非常重要的部分。很多刚入手的新生不知道如何复习GMAT写作,而且出现了一些问题。小编下面分享的是作文错误的七宗罪。

  第一宗罪:无因果联系

  The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B, the former event is responsible for the latter. (The author uses the positive correlation between A and B to establish causality. However, the fact that A coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused B.) But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.

  第二宗罪 样本不足

  The evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion (The statistics from only a few recent years are not necessarily a good indicator of future trends), unless it can be shown that A1 is representative of all A. It is possible that.... In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted.

  第三宗罪: 错误类比

  The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison between A and B, there is much dissimilarity as well. For example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do....

  第四宗罪 时地全等

  The author commits the fallacy of “all things are equal”. The fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that.... The author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it is not clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same as they used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that....

  第五宗罪 二者择一

  The author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.

  第六宗罪 可疑调查

  The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or when, where and how the poll was conducted. (Lacking information about the number of people surveyed and the number of respondents, it is impossible to access the validity of the results. For example, if 200 persons were surveyed but only 2 responded, the conclusion that...would be highly suspect. Because the argument offers no evidence that would rule out this kind of interpretations,) Until these questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.

  第七宗罪 结论无据

  The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that.... However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that.... Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility

  上述就是小编总结的GMAT作文考试错误的七宗罪,同学们复习GMAT作文的时候是不是也出现过这些问题呢?希望大家复习GMAT写作的时候重点的关注一下,不要出现这些十分明显的错误。

推荐新闻:

after在GMAT语法中的妙用

GMAT阅读机经有哪些作用呢

GMAT数学考试复习循序渐进的方法



相关字搜索:GMAT作文考试   GMAT作文   GMAT   
gmat在线咨询

Copyright ©2004-2018 www.xiaoma.com All Rights Resserved 小马过河版权所有

课程咨询电话:400-920-8185 邮箱:tech@sanlischool.com

课程咨询请扫描以上二维码

关于我们 网站地图

京ICP备14009560号-3

京公网安备 11010802021370号